Splet11. apr. 2024 · They also violated the ruling in Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015), which established precise rules for content banning. The government cannot decide if any material is “fake” or “false” without a right of appeal or the ability for judicial monitoring since the power to do so could be abused to thwart examination or investigation ... SpletShreya Singhal v. Union of India, 2015 (5) SCC 1. Such an offence has to be handled with care and used sparingly, as observed in Baradakanta Mishra v. Registrar of Orissa High Court & another, (1974) 1 SCC 374. There is inconsistency in various decisions relating to
Shreya Singhal V. Union of India - The Cyber Blog India
SpletPred 1 uro · The Supreme Court in the case of Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India, referring to the broad and vague nature of the now unconstitutional Section 66A of the IT Act, stated as follows: In point of fact, Section 66A is cast so widely that virtually any opinion on any subject would be covered by it, as any serious opinion dissenting with the mores ... Splet17. apr. 2024 · Title of the case: Shreya Singhal vs Union of India. Citation: AIR 2015 SC 1523. Court:-Supreme Court of India. Bench:- J. Chelameswar, Rohinton Fali Nariman Parties: Petitioner: Shreya Singhal. Respondent: Union of India. Brief Facts of the Case: In … Apr 30 CASE SUMMARY: YOUTH BAR ASSOCIATION OF INDIA VS. UNION OF … citizens utility board of wisconsin
India: Impact Of Shreya Singhal Judgment On Intermediaries - Mondaq
Splet07. sep. 2024 · Case Name : SHREYA SINGHAL VS UNION OF INDIA Author : Vaibhavi Batra EQUIVALENT CITATION (2013) 12 SCC 73 BENCH Justice Jasti Chelameswar and … Splet16. mar. 2024 · By. Niyati Acharya. -. March 16, 2024. In the Supreme Court of India Criminal/ Civil Original Jurisdiction Case No. Writ Petition No. 167 of 2012 Petitioner Shreya Singhal Respondent Union of India Date of Judgment Decided on 24th March, 2015 Bench Justice Jasti Chelameswar, Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman. Splet02. feb. 2024 · Shreya Singhal v/s Union of India judgment The striking down of Section 66A of the IT Act — under which posting ‘offensive’ comments online was a crime punishable by jail — by the Supreme Court in 2015 was hailed by many, but mixed feelings have remained. While Section 69A was also challenged, it was upheld by the court. dickies relaxed fit straight leg women jeans